A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
refers to some landmark case decided through the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Right here’s a brief overview:
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity of your offense demands the most stringent punishment, considering the sanctity of human life and deterrence for potential offenders.
Case files could also be accessed from the public access terminals during the clerk’s office of the court where the case was filed.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed during the bank and considering the fact that only the appellants were posted at the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade from the accused hasn't been conducted still. In the moment case, now the accused attempted to acquire advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture on the petitioner was broadly circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity in the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance towards the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly with the witness to identify the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer set a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and created images. Besides, the images shown about the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to hide his identity right up until he was set up for an identification parade. Making pictures in the accused publically, either by showing the same on the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or method, would create doubt in the proceedings from the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to be certain that there is no chance with the witness to see the accused before going on the identification parade. The accused should not be shown on the witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or perhaps the press or electronic media. Provided the reasons elaborated over, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mold the relief to really make it acceptable for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
only on the ground of miscases remanded & only over the ground of misreading of evidence only within the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
Electronic and paper court records retained at the court site is usually viewed with the courthouse for free, however there is actually a payment of 10 cents per page to print from a public access terminal.
Accessing free case regulation sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and anybody seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and case regulation at both the federal and state levels.
The DCFS social worker in charge of the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report on the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion with the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property may sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or even to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
To receive notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia plus the Court of Appeals of Virginia more info when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become out there, please enter your contact information beneath.